Chapter 253
2006 — S 3050 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED
Enacted 07/03/06
A N A C T
RELATING TO TAXATION — PROPERTY TAXES
Introduced By: Senators Paiva-Weed, J Montalbano, Alves, Lenihan, and Felag
Date Introduced: April 27, 2006
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 44-5-2 of the General Laws in Chapter 44-5 entitled “Levy and
Assessment of Local Taxes” is hereby amended to read as follows:
44-5-2. Maximum levy. — (a) A Through and including its fiscal year 2007, a city and or
town may levy a tax in an amount not more than five and one-half percent (5.5%) in excess of the
amount levied and certified by that city or town for the prior year. Through and including its
fiscal year 2007, but in no fiscal year thereafter, the The amount levied by a city or town is
deemed to be consistent with the five and one-half percent (5.5%) levy growth cap if the tax rate
is not more than one hundred and five and one-half percent (105.5%) of the prior year’s tax rate
and the budget resolution or ordinance, as applicable, specifies that the tax rate is not increasing
by more than five and one-half percent (5.5%) except as specified in subsection (c) of this
section. In all years when a revaluation or update is not being implemented, a tax rate is deemed
to be one hundred five and one-half percent (105.5%) or less of the prior year’s tax rate if the tax
on a parcel of real property, the value of which is unchanged for purpose of taxation, is no more
than one hundred five and one-half percent (105.5%) of the prior year’s tax on the same parcel of
real property. In any year through and including fiscal year 2007 when a revaluation or update is
being implemented, the tax rate is deemed to be one hundred five and one-half percent (105.5%)
of the prior year’s tax rate as certified by the division of local government assistance in the
department of administration.
(b) In its fiscal year 2008, a city or town may levy a tax in an amount not more than five
and one-quarter percent (5.25%) in excess of the total amount levied and certified by that city or
town for its fiscal year 2007. In its fiscal year 2009, a city or town may levy a tax in an amount
not more than five percent (5%) in excess of the total amount levied and certified by that city or
town for its fiscal year 2008. In its fiscal year 2010, a city or town may levy a tax in an amount
not more than four and three-quarters percent (4.75%) in excess of the total amount levied and
certified by that city or town in its fiscal year 2009. In its fiscal year 2011, a city or town may
levy a tax in an amount not more than four and one-half percent (4.5%) in excess of the total
amount levied and certified by that city or town in its fiscal year 2010. In its fiscal year 2012, a
city or town may levy a tax in an amount not more than four and one-quarter percent (4.25%) in
excess of the total amount levied and certified by that city or town in its fiscal year 2011. In its
fiscal year 2013 and in each fiscal year thereafter, a city or town may levy a tax in an amount not
more than four percent (4%) in excess of the total amount levied and certified by that city or town
for its previous fiscal year.
(b)(c) The office of municipal affairs in the department of administration shall monitor
city and town compliance with this levy cap, issue periodic reports to the general assembly on
compliance, and make recommendations on the continuation or modification of the levy cap on or
before December 31, 1987, December 31, 1990, and December 31, every third year thereafter.
The chief elected official in each city and town shall provide to the office of municipal affairs
within thirty (30) days of final action, in the form required, the adopted tax levy and rate and
other pertinent information.
(c)(d) The amount levied by a city or town may exceed the five and one-half percent
(5.5%) percentage increase as specified in subsection (a) or (b) of this section if the city or town
qualifies under one or more of the following provisions:
(1) The city or town forecasts or experiences a loss in total non-property tax revenues
and the loss is certified by the department of administration.
(2) The city or town experiences or anticipates an emergency situation, which causes or
will cause the levy to exceed five and one-half percent (5.5%) the percentage increase as
specified in subsection (a) or (b) of this section. In the event of an emergency or an anticipated
emergency, the city or town shall notify the auditor general who shall certify the existence or
anticipated existence of the emergency. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, an
emergency shall be deemed to exist when the city or town experiences or anticipates health
insurance costs, retirement contributions or utility expenditures which exceed the prior fiscal
year’s health insurance costs, retirement contributions or utility expenditures by a percentage
greater than three (3) times the percentage increase as specified in subsection (a) or (b) of this
section.
(3) A city or town forecasts or experiences debt services expenditures which are more
than one hundred five and one-half percent (105.5%) of exceed the prior year’s debt service
expenditures by an amount greater than the percentage increase as specified in subsection (a) or
(b) of this section and which are the result of bonded debt issued in a manner consistent with
general law or a special act. In the event of the debt service increase, the city or town shall notify
the department of administration which shall certify the debt service increase above one hundred
five and one-half percent (105.5%) of the percentage increase as specified in subsection (a) or (b)
of this section the prior year’s debt service. No action approving or disapproving exceeding a levy
cap under the provisions of this section affects the requirement to pay obligations as described in
subsection (d) of this section.
(4) The city or town experiences substantial growth in its tax base as the result of major
new construction which necessitates either significant infrastructure or school housing
expenditures by the city or town or a significant increase in the need for essential municipal
services and such increase in expenditures or demand for services is certified by the department
of administration.
(4) (e) Any levy pursuant to subsection (c) (d) of this section in excess of the five and
one-half percent (5.5%) percentage increase specified in subsection (a) of this section shall be
approved by a majority vote the affirmative vote of at least four-fifths (4/5) of the full
membership of the governing body of the city or town or in the case of a city or town having a
financial town meeting, the majority of the electors present and voting at the town financial
meeting shall also approve the excess levy.
(d) (f) Nothing contained in this section constrains the payment of present or future
obligations as prescribed by section 45-12-1, and all taxable property in each city or town is
subject to taxation without limitation as to rate or amount to pay general obligation bonds or notes
of the city or town except as otherwise specifically provided by law or charter.
SECTION 2. Sections 44-35-3 and 44-35-6 of the General Laws in Chapter 44-35
entitled “Property Tax and Fiscal Disclosure – Municipal Budgets” are hereby amended to read as
follows:
44-35-3. Definitions. — (a) “Adjusted current property tax rate” means the estimated
property tax rate that would be necessary in the next fiscal year to raise one hundred and five and
one-half percent (105.5%) of the property tax revenues in the next fiscal year that were levied in
the town’s or city’s current fiscal year. the maximum levy authorized by section 44-5-2 of the
general laws.
(b) “Chief elected official” means the highest locally elected official in each town or city.
(c) “Proposed property tax rate” means the estimated property tax rate that is proposed
by a town or city to support its operating budget for the town’s or city’s next fiscal year.
44-35-6. Publication of property tax rates. — At least ten (10) calendar days prior to the
hearing for the purpose of adopting the town or city budget, the chief elected official in each town
or city shall cause to be published a notice indicating the town’s or city’s intent to consider
adopting a property tax levy. This notice shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the town or city. However, this notice may not be placed in that portion of the newspaper
where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. This notice shall constitute notice of
public hearing which may coincide with the hearing on the proposed budget and shall be by and
in the following form:
(CITY, TOWN) of (NAME)
NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX
RATE CHANGE
The (City, Town) proposes to increase (decrease) its property tax levy to ________ in
the ________ budget year; the property tax levy this year is __________, THIS IS A
PROPOSED INCREASE (DECREASE) OF ______%.
It has been estimated that the proposed increase (decrease) in property tax revenues will
result in a property tax rate of $________ (proposed property tax rate) per $1,000 assessed
valuation, as compared to the current property tax rate of $________ per $1,000 assessed
valuation.
A property tax rate of $________ (adjusted current property tax rate) would be needed in
the coming budget year to raise five and one-half percent (5.5%) more, as an adjustment for
increased costs, than the property tax revenues being raised in the current budget year. the
maximum levy authorized by section 44-5-2 of the general laws.
The (City, Town) budget __________ will be considered at (date, time, place).
The above property tax estimates have been computed in a manner approved by the
Rhode Island Department of Administration.
Chief Elected Official
SECTION 3. Section 44-45-2 of the General Laws in Chapter 44-45 entitled “Omnibus
Property Tax Relief and Replacement Act” is hereby amended to read as follows:
44-45-2. Legislative findings. — The general assembly finds and declares that the
following conditions confront Rhode Island at this time:
(1) In 1982, the governor’s advisory commission to study the financial operations of state
and local governments found that “when the state and local tax system is viewed in its totality, it
becomes clear that property tax relief and replacement is needed”.
(2) Rhode Island has a serious over reliance on the property tax, as evidenced by the
facts that:
(i) Rhode Islanders paid forty-nine dollars and ninety-two cents ($49.92) per capita in
property tax collections in fiscal year 1983, compared to a U.S. average of thirty-four dollars and
seventy-one cents ($34.71), ranking this state sixth highest in the nation;
(ii) Per one thousand dollars ($1,000) of personal income, property tax collections in
Rhode Island equaled five hundred and thirty-seven dollars ($537) that year, compared to a three
hundred and eighty-one dollar ($381) U.S. average, placing the state ninth highest nationally; and
(iii) Rhode Island’s cities and towns derived fifty-eight and nine-tenths percent (58.9%)
of their own-source local general revenue from the property tax in fiscal year 1983, compared to
an average of only twenty-eight and eight-tenths percent (28.8%) for all the states.
(3) In 1983-84, Rhode Island ranked only forty-third nationally in terms of state support
for public elementary and secondary school, providing only thirty-six percent (36%) of these
revenues.
(4) The state educational operations aid formula should be gradually increased until the
state and municipalities equally share the cost of providing local education. The general assembly
remains committed to that objective and intends to pursue that objective aggressively upon
receipt and consideration of the final report of the joint legislative committee to establish a
permanent education foundation aid formula in accordance with section 16-7.2-2 of the general
laws.
(5) The state should also share a greater portion of its economically sensitive growth
taxes with its cities and towns in order to further shift the burden of funding essential municipal
services from the property tax.
(6) The growth in property tax levies should be capped in accordance with section 44-5-
2 of the general laws to five and one-half percent (5.5%) annual growth as a quid pro quo for
receiving increased state aid to reduce reliance on the property tax.
(7) Cities and towns should be assisted in their efforts to control school and municipal
expenditures by appropriately amending state arbitration and school budgeting laws.
SECTION 4. Chapter 45-2 of the General Laws entitled “General Powers” is hereby
amended by adding thereto the following section:
45-2-3.2. Availability of funds upon failure of city or town to approve annual
appropriation. – Unless otherwise provided by a city or town charter, in an emergency caused
by a failure of a city or town to approve an annual appropriation measure, the same amounts
appropriated in the previous fiscal year shall be available for each department and division
thereof, subject to monthly or quarterly allotments, in accordance with seasonal requirements, as
determined by the city or town’s chief financial officer: provided, that expenditures for payment
of bonded indebtedness of the city or town and interest thereon shall be in such amounts as may
be required, regardless of whether or not an annual appropriation ordinance is enacted by the city
or town council.
SECTION 5. Section 16-2-21 of the General Laws in Chapter 16-2 entitled “School
Committees and Superintendents” is hereby amended to read as follows:
16-2-21. Pre-budget consultation — Annual reports — Appropriation requests —
Budgets. — (a) At least sixty (60) days but not more than ninety (90) days prior to the formal
submission of the school budget to the appropriate city or town officials by the school committee,
there shall be a joint pre-budget meeting between the school committee and the city or town
council(s). At or before this meeting:
(1) The highest elected official of the city or town shall submit to the school committee
an estimate, prepared in a manner approved by the department of administration, of projected
revenues for the next fiscal year. In the case of the property tax, the projections shall include only
changes in the property tax base, not property tax rates;
(2) The school committee shall submit to the city or town council a statement for the
next ensuing fiscal year of anticipated total expenditures, projected enrollments with resultant
staff and facility requirements, and any necessary or mandated changes in school programs or
operations; and
(3) The school committee shall prepare and submit, annually, to the department of
elementary and secondary education, on or before the first day of August, a report in the manner
and form prescribed by the state board of regents for elementary and secondary education; the
committee shall also prepare not less than thirty (30) days before the date of the annual financial
town meeting, or the date of the meeting of the city council at which annual appropriations are
made, on forms prescribed and furnished by the department of elementary and secondary
education, the estimates and recommendations of the amounts necessary to be appropriated for
the support of public schools for the fiscal year ensuing; provided, that a copy of these estimates
and recommendations shall be sent to the department of elementary and secondary education, and
until the report is made, and if the estimates and recommendations are not presented to the
department, it may refuse to draw its orders for the money in the state treasury apportioned to the
city or town; provided, that the necessary blank for the report has been furnished by the
department on or before the first day of June, next preceding, and the necessary forms for the
estimates and recommendations shall have been furnished by the department not less than sixty
(60) days before the date of the annual appropriations meeting of the city council; the committee
shall also prepare and submit annually to the department of elementary and secondary education
and at the annual financial town meeting a report to the city or town, setting forth its doings, the
state and condition of the schools, and plans for their improvement, which report, unless printed,
shall be read in open meeting; and if printed, at least three (3) copies shall be transmitted to the
department on or before the day of the annual financial town meeting in each year.
(b) If the amount appropriated by the town meeting, the city or town council, or budget
referendum is either more or less than the amount recommended and requested by the school
committee, the school committee shall, within thirty (30) days after the appropriation is made,
amend its estimates and recommendations so that expenses are no greater than the total of all
revenue appropriated by the state or town or provided for public schools under the care, control,
and management of the school committee.
(c) Only a school budget in which total expenses are less than or equal to appropriations
and revenues shall be considered an adopted school budget.
(d) Notwithstanding any provision of the general or public laws to the contrary:
(i) the budget adopted and presented by any school committee for the fiscal year 2008
shall not propose the appropriation of municipal funds (exclusive of state and federal aid) in
excess of one hundred five and one-quarter percent (105.25%) of the total of municipal funds
appropriated by the city or town council for school purposes for fiscal year 2007;
(ii) the budget adopted and presented by any school committee for the fiscal year 2009
shall not propose the appropriation of municipal funds (exclusive of state and federal aid) in
excess of one hundred five percent (105%) of the total of municipal funds appropriated by the
city or town council for school purposes for fiscal year 2008;
(iii) the budget adopted and presented by any school committee for the fiscal year 2010
shall not propose the appropriation of municipal funds (exclusive of state and federal aid) in
excess of one hundred four and three-quarters percent (104.75%) of the total of municipal funds
appropriated by the city or town council for school purposes for fiscal year 2009;
(iv) the budget adopted and presented by any school committee for the fiscal year 2011
shall not propose the appropriation of municipal funds (exclusive of state and federal aid) in
excess of one hundred four and one-half percent (104.5%) of the total of municipal funds
appropriated by the city or town council for school purposes for fiscal year 2010;
(v) the budget adopted and presented by any school committee for the fiscal year 2012
shall not propose the appropriation of municipal funds (exclusive of state and federal aid) in
excess of one hundred four and one-quarter percent (104.25%) of the total of municipal funds
appropriated by the city or town council for school purposes for fiscal year 2011; and
(vi) the budget adopted and presented by any school committee for the fiscal year 2013
and for each fiscal year thereafter shall not propose the appropriation of municipal funds
(exclusive of state and federal aid) in excess of one hundred four percent (104%) of the total of
municipal funds appropriated by the city or town council for school purposes for fiscal year
2012.
(e) Notwithstanding any provision of the general or public laws to the contrary, any
judgment rendered pursuant to subsection 16-2-21.4(b) shall consider the percentage caps on
school district budgets set forth in subsection (d) of this section.
SECTION 6. Sections 45-13-7, 45-13-8 and 45-13-9 of the General Laws in Chapter 45-
13 entitled “State Aid” are hereby amended to read as follows:
45-13-7. State mandated costs defined. — “State mandate” means any state initiated
statutory or executive action or rule, regulation or policy adopted by a state department or agency
or a quasi-public department or agency that requires a local government to establish, expand, or
modify its activities in a way as to necessitate additional expenditures from local government
revenue sources where the expenditures are not otherwise reimbursed in whole or in part. When
state statutory or executive actions or rules, regulations or policies are intended to achieve
compliance with federal statutes or regulations or court orders, state mandates shall be determined
as follows:
(1) Where the federal statute or regulations or court order is discretionary, the state
statutory or executive action shall be considered a state mandate for the purposes of sections 45-
13-7 — 45-13-10.
(2) Where the state statutory or executive action or rule, regulation or policy exceeds
what is required by the federal statute or regulation or court order, only the provisions of the state
action which exceed the federal requirements shall be considered a state mandate for the purposes
of sections 45-13-7 — 45-13-10.
(3) Where the state statutory or executive action or rule, regulation or policy does not
exceed what is required by the federal statute or regulation or court order, the state action shall
not be considered a state mandate for the purposes of sections 45-13-7 — 45-13-10.
(4) Where the cost of a single state mandate does not exceed the sum of five hundred
dollars ($500) the state mandate shall not be reimbursable.
45-13-8. Reports. — (a) The department of administration in consultation and
cooperation with towns and cities shall maintain:
(1) An identification of state mandates created by statute since January 1, 1970;
(2) Specific identification of all state mandates established since July 1, 1979 which are
subject to reimbursement in accordance with section 45-13-9, and the cost of each of these
mandates to each city and town.
(b) The department of administration shall annually by January 1 issue a report
identifying the state’s mandates established during the preceding July 1 — June 30 period and
stating the cost by city and town of all state mandates established after January 1, 1979, for the
next preceding July 1 — June 30 period. The department of administration shall annually issue to
cities and towns a comprehensive listing of all state mandates established after January 1, 1979.
(c) (1) Statutes and regulations containing state mandates shall include items eligible for
reimbursement; however, failure to include these items shall not exempt any state mandates not
otherwise exempted from the provisions of sections 45-13-7 — 45-13-10.
(2) Cities and towns shall submit to the department of administration in any form that
may be established by the department, a report of the cost of each state mandate established after
January 1, 1979, to the city or town. The reports shall be submitted by April 1 each year and shall
state costs incurred by the city or town during the preceding July 1 — June 30 period.
(3) The reports of cities and towns requesting reimbursement for state mandates are
subject to audit procedures established under section 45-10-5.1.
(d) The department of administration shall issue by January 1, 1988 and by January 1 of
each fourth (4th) year thereafter, a report to the governor and the General Assembly
recommending the modification or repeal of existing state mandates which are deemed to be
inappropriate or obsolete and citing the reason for the recommendation on the fourth (4th) year
anniversary of those state mandates. This report shall be prepared by the local government
assistance division Rhode Island office of municipal affairs within the department of
administration in consultation and cooperation with the affected state agencies and the Rhode
Island league of cities and towns and the Rhode Island association of school committees.
(e) All reports issued by the department of administration in accordance with this
subsection shall be adopted by rule as provided for in chapter 35 of title 42.
45-13-9. Reimbursement to cities and towns for the costs of state mandates. —
Reimbursement to cities and towns and school districts for the costs of state mandates. — (a)
(1) The department of administration shall submit to the budget office by September October 1 of
each year, a report by each city and town, of the cost of state mandates established after January
1, 1979, to be reimbursed for the next preceding July 1 — June 30 period.
(2) The budget office shall annually include the statewide total of the statement of costs
of state mandates to be reimbursed in the state budget for the next fiscal year; provided, that any
costs resulting from the rules and regulations of state departments or agencies shall be allocated
to the budgets of those departments or agencies.
(b) The state treasurer shall in July of each year distribute to cities and towns the
reimbursements for state mandated costs in accordance with the report submitted by the
department of administration to the state budget office.
SECTION 7. Chapter 45-13 of the General Laws entitled “State Aid” is hereby amended
by adding thereto the following section:
45-13-11.1. Excuse, avoidance or suspension of reimbursement requirements. — The
provisions of sections 45-13-6 through 45-13-10 of this chapter may be excused, avoided or
suspended only by law enacted by the affirmative vote of three-fifths (3/5) of the full membership
of each house of the general assembly.
SECTION 8. It is the finding of the General Assembly that the most burdensome tax that
the citizens of this state must pay is the property tax. In order to provide relief from the adverse
impact of that tax, the General Assembly requires certain information. The Office of Municipal
Affairs in the Department of Administration is therefore authorized to and directed to undertake
an inventory of all current property tax treaties; payments in lieu of taxes, agreements reached
through ordinance or public law; all exemptions, including delayed payments, freezes or any
other programs in any form, and any and all other similar mechanisms for reducing property taxes
and/or providing property tax relief within and among the several cities and towns, including the
legal basis for the granting of these treaties agreements, and exemptions by the municipalities.
The several cities and towns are hereby requested to provide whatever assistance may be
necessary or useful to the Office of Municipal Affairs in executing its responsibilities hereunder.
The Office of Municipal Affairs is further authorized and directed to review and analyze
this material and to make a report and recommendations to the General Assembly by November
15, 2006, with copies to the President of the Senate, Speaker of the House, the Chairperson of the
Senate Finance Committee, the Chairperson of the House Finance Committee, the Senate Fiscal
Advisor and the House Fiscal Advisor.
It is the intention of the legislature that procedures and methodologies utilized for tax
treaties, payment in lieu of taxes, tax agreements and other property tax stabilization vehicles
employed by the various cities and towns be treated in the same manner with regard to
determination of value relative to tax rolls and the use of this information for determining state
aid, including education state aid to said communities. Payments in lieu of taxes covered under
section 45-13-5.1 of the General Laws need not be reviewed.
SECTION 9. This act shall take effect upon passage, except that sections 6 and 7 shall
take effect on January 1, 2007.
=======
LC03048/5
=======